Author Archives: James Hodgson

Avatar

About James Hodgson

James Hodgson is artistic director of We are a Real Theatre Company and a partner at 111 Collectiff. He is a performer and collaborator whose work is bold and contemporary, often verging on performance art. He is a graduate of Rose Bruford, in European Theatre Arts. James is also festival director of St Leonards Festival.

The Joke - Photo by Brian Roberts

Will Adamsdale & Fuel: The Joke

The Joke - Photo by Brian RobertsAn Englishman, an Irishman, and a Scotsman: it’s a good premise, one we’re all familiar with, and certainly holds the potential for not only a good dose of laughs, but also a puerile potential for political undertones.  The Joke, presented by Will Adamsdale and Fuel Theatre at Camden People’s Theatre, sets itself up in exactly this fashion, but unfortunately on many levels falls short of its own expectations.

We begin by sitting, collectively sharing the experience of staring into an empty space, before eventually the silence is broken by seemingly one of our own. A man tucked away three rows back begins to whisper to an audience member in front, to ask what’s going on. The premise feels obvious and it’s quite awkward, deliberately so, before breaking down. He stands, proclaiming his need to leave, as ‘nothing is going to happen,’ only to find that the door to the exit is now locked. Thus the play ensues, and two other characters are introduced (including CPT’s own artistic Director and erstwhile Cartoon de Salvo performer Brian Logan), both equally confused about their motives for being here. Eventually, the trio whittle down the possibilities, concluding rather absurdly that they must be trapped in a joke, and in order to escape they must set about presenting this joke in its entirety. Farce follows with far too numerous retellings and re-imaginings of the Man Overboard joke, concerning an English Captain, an Irish deck-scrubber, a Scotsman – who might be the lookout, I’m not too sure – and a Boy/Buoy. I’m sure you’ve heard it.

The main problem lies in an underdeveloped plot, and the lack of any clear resolution. Indeed, the play rather fizzles out, seemingly having run out of ideas. There is no indication as to why all of a sudden they are able to escape the joke:  it is overlooked.  Even more frustratingly, the perfect closure presents itself. As they share their last remaining tic-tacs, the following quip is heard: ‘We’ve got no tic-tacs, and you could say, no tac-tics.’ The trio collectively laugh, in a moment which celebrates the simplicity of a joke’s ability to bring laughter from the most unexpected of places. They succeeded on their voyage to discover ‘why we tell jokes’. I could almost see the door swinging open, proclaiming their chance discovery in a moment of despair. But it remained firmly shut.

There were simple problems with pace and comic timing.  Cheap gags reigned supreme, which is fine, but it all felt woolly. Comedy demands precision, there was too much uncontrolled mayhem here.  Each performer took it in turn to lead gag after gag, allowing no time to establish a rapport between themselves. The play makes reference to the Marx Brothers and the contrast felt telling. Chico, Harpo, Groucho, Gummo and Zeppo each developed very distinct personas, complementing each other in highly situational-based comedy. Here the situation, however abstract, was present, but the three performers didn’t utilise their complementing traits, and this stunted the comedic effect.

The play isn’t without merits; Lloyd Hutchinson makes an amiable Irishman, the butt of many a joke but by far the most accomplished in his comedic delivery. His timing is precise and raises genuine laughs and he balanced the tone well rendering the melodramatic elements of the plot less garish.

Comedy is tricky – and even more so when there is an attempt to deconstruct it. Here, it feels like too many elements are in the mix, and the result lacks the polish and wit the concept deserves. There is certainly potential in the subject matter and these are three accomplished performers in their own right.  A bit more exploration may well unearth a more cohesive dialogue to carry the play forward.

Forced Entertainment: Complete Works: Table Top Shakespeare

In their latest offering, Complete Works: Table Top Shakespeare, Forced Entertainment continue to explore their fascination with storytelling, presented here in its purest form. It’s no mean feat: 36 plays over six days, shared between six performers. Forced Entertainment are no strangers to this sort of durational experiment – those familiar with their work will note their improvised project Quizoola, regularly performed over 6 or 24 hours, demanding the performers to answer and ask a constant barrage of questions. However, there is something altogether more wholesome, and certainly more accessible about their latest musings.

Included as part of the Shakespeare weekender at the Barbican, the Pit theatre was simply set with two packed pantry shelves, neatly framing a simple wooden table centre-stage. Immediate intrigue is provoked in an audience of all ages, as condiments, egg cups and other knick-knacks are carefully positioned by the table, ready for the ensuing play.

I caught four of the 36 plays – Julius Caesar (Robin Arthur), Merry Wives of Windsor (Terry O’Connor), Troilus and Cressida (Jerry Killick), and Antony and Cleopatra (Cathy Naden).

The premise is simple and the same basic structure is used for every play, but each offers something quite unique. Each narrator starts out by plotting the course of their play with the help of a specific group of household items, each one representing a character. The table top becomes the stage, sugar-shakers and marmite pots the players. It isn’t Shakespeare as we know it: no iambic pentameter or soliloquising, but a bare-bones oration of character, motive and plot.

The stories unfold, and the performers demonstrate a virtuosity for storytelling. We hang on every word, even if we’re familiar with the story. The stories are enriched in the retelling as the playful performers each bring their own persona into the mix. It is a familiar trait of FE’s work, allowing the natural traits of the actor to inform their performances.

It is an object theatre of sorts, but it is important to establish here that we are not witnessing object manipulation in the usual sense of this term. There is very little personifying of the bottles and tins on the table, and no illusion that these objects are something meta- it is more like watching a graphic score unfold, or battle plans being discussed. The objects are signifiers to the characters’ presence, and occasionally their movement, but rarely do they actually move. Having said this, the object assignment to each character has clear motives. Caesar, for example, is played by a large bottle of olive oil, considerably bigger and more luxurious than any other character in the play. In contrast, servants and maids are played by the more menial objects from the pantry – tiny salt-shakers, bobbins and eggcups. Cleopatra is later embodied by a delicate, ornate china cup, far more elegant than any object thus far, and by far the most fragile (fickle). Assimilating the objects in this way aids in the delivery of humour, context and subtext.

Throughout the performances there are moments of pure joy: O’Connor’s treatment of the bumbling Falstaff (a rotund bottle of sherry) is a perfect example. She is intrigued by her own storytelling, excited, occasionally falling over her own words, mirroring the farce at play. Robin Arthur by contrast delivers some of the most poignant and delicately crafter friezes: his gaze and piercing focus upon the characters is emotionally transfixing. It is reminiscent of his precise craftsmanship in Forced Entertainment’s earlier work, The Notebook.

Complete Works may lack the usual romp and vigour of FE’s more experimental large-scale works, but it still bares one trademark of Etchells’ meticulous direction: keep nought that is unnecessary. The clarity and simplicity is the triumph of this project, a demonstration of theatrical storytelling at its best.