Author Archives: Lisa Wolfe

Avatar

About Lisa Wolfe

Lisa Wolfe is a freelance theatre producer and project manager of contemporary small-scale work. Companies and people she has supported include: A&E Comedy, Three Score Dance, Pocket Epics, Jennifer Irons,Tim Crouch, Liz Aggiss, Sue MacLaine, Spymonkey and many more. Lisa was Marketing Manager at Brighton Dome and Festival (1989-2001) and has also worked for South East Dance, Chichester Festival Theatre and Company of Angels. She is Marketing Manager for Carousel, learning-disability arts company.

Touretteshero: Not I

‘There are three people on stage. Don’t tell the Beckett Estate. Shit!’

Turns out that Edward Beckett sees the benefit in making uncle Samuel’s work more accessible. Eureka! He allows Jess Thoms, aka Touretteshero, to adapt the work to suit her particular physical and neurological requirements.

Many of Beckett’s characters are disabled. Think of Endgame: Hamm’s parents, confined to dustbins, Hamm himself blind and unable to stand, his servant unable to sit. Or Winnie in Happy Days, buried up to her neck in sand. But it’s Mouth, poor Mouth, just a mouth, who is most trapped. Isolated eight foot above us in a circle of light, uncertain how she came to be here, or of what has passed. Imagine!

Jess Thoms is bold and bloody-minded about a theatre world that for years denied her the freedom to be herself. To move and shout and tic as she does, without feeling she is ruining the show for everyone else. Since making her first show, the joyful autobiographical Backstage In Biscuit Land – ‘biscuit’ being her most frequent tic – she has become a fierce and passionate advocate for disability rights and a rigorous and courageous theatre maker.

Tackling Beckett’s most demanding work is daunting for any actress: a thirteen minute unrelenting stream of consciousness which circles in on itself in short phrases separated by gasps for breath. Jessica Tandy was traumatised by it 1972 (Forum Theater, New York) and more recently Lisa Dwan has described the experience of being strapped into position, unable to move or see, delivering lines at breakneck speed.

Jess introduces her version to us at floor level, the audience sitting on low benches or cushions, and explains how Tourettes affects her performance. She tell us we are free to move about and make any noises we need to make. With her is British Sign Language interpreter Charmaine Wombwell. Pregnant! She’ll be performing the work too, including any unscripted ‘biscuits.’

Darkness. Light on a face above us, LED-lights hidden in a hood illuminate Mouth and a bit of nose. Then she’s off, words spilling out of her, she can’t stop the stream. There has been no love of any kind and now Mouth is coming up to 70. And all the time the buzzing in the skull. Is it some kind of punishment? It’s not hard to see why this piece resonated so strongly with Jess, and why she spent a year learning it, and longer gathering the right team around her to make it happen. Certain lines are so true to Jess’s experience it stops you in your tracks: ‘…and the brain…raving away on its own…trying to make sense of it…or make it stop.’

Bringing out all the poetry and rage of the text, Jess is spellbinding to watch, occasionally bashing at her chest, sometimes unable to hold back the ‘biscuits’ which want to fill the silences. Blimey! Charmaine translates it all in concert with Jess, which splits the focus somewhat as both are fascinating to watch.

A behind-the-scenes film follows, showing how the piece was made, with technical experts and mentors, directors and designers. It’s a fascinating insight into the process, and brilliant to see Rosemary Poutney, one of the first performers of Not I, share her experience with Jess.

To complete the event, we’re invited to talk to our neighbours. Mine happen to be Mr and Mrs Thoms, who seem awestruck by their daughter – and rightly so. After a short Q&A we’re encouraged to make some noise. I’m happy to do so, but feel I would have liked to make more noise at the end of her performance, Bravo! and then to sit with it for a while. It’s great to grasp the opportunity to share your passion for equality and diversity with the audience, but I’d have loved a little longer with Mouth, and time to process the experience. The art says it all.

 

 

Ursula Martinez: Free Admission

She’s not one to do things by halves, so if there’s going to be a stage metaphor, it’s going to be a bloody great big one.

First though, is an introductory preamble, by which Ursula Martinez means to make that important initial impact on an audience, and handover her mobile phone for a selfie to be taken later on. She wants to please us, but we know she is going to be a tease. Her visual impact is immediate: she looks striking in a white trouser suit, an up-do and jewels. Ursula then retreats behind the little proscenium arch theatre on stage and the red curtains open. She pulls on builder’s gloves, wields a trowel, mixes some mortar and starts to work.

She’s going to build, literally build, a wall between herself and the audience.  Will it be the performer’s conceptual fourth wall, or more of a Trump-like defensive structure? Words begin to get thrown down with the cement, whip-crack one-liners and observations that range around gender, religion and politics. Is this wall keeping her in, or us out? How the references pile up!

Ursula Martinez has a knack of combining the personal with the universal in a way that continuously surprises. Perhaps it’s the casual crudeness of the language, where a sentence might quite innocently describe ‘taking it up the shitter’.

As the first layer of bricks is laid, Ursula recounts the jolly playground racism of 1970’s singing games and her family’s idiosyncrasies, mimicking her mother’s thick Spanish accent, all the while slathering on the glue, putting the blocks of her life in place.

In her previous show, My Stories, Your Emails Ursula explored the gap between her idea of herself and those projected on to her via social media. Free Admission is similarly vitriolic about such ‘virtual’ abuse. It’s one of the many things that, during the building the second layer of bricks, seriously pisses her off. Another is people who back out of a conversation saying ‘anyhoo’.

The physical building is as fascinating to watch as the script is to hear – it’s a well-paced combination of movement and text. Properly funny too: ‘Sometimes, I’m convinced my ex-wife used to fake not having orgasms.’ There’s a lightness of tone and a joy in the performance that constantly undercuts the harsh truths of a beautifully written, personal story. And yes she does tease, doing a remarkably fine Jamaican accent when she wants to, not when we want to hear it. Mark Whitelaw’s direction keeps the piece flowing and the inevitability of the construct never becomes dull.

There’s a break for Ursula to come out front to share some statistics about the audience demographic, for example how many of us are likely to be gay (an underestimate as it happens – this is Brighton after all). If this section is little less interesting it must give her arms a welcome rest and it provides some close interaction.

As layer four goes up the material darkens, as if by concealing herself from us she is free to reveal more. We’ve heard about her father’s death in hospital, now comes her mother’s escape from the Spanish Civil War as a three-year-old, heavy with the consequences of a non-understood action. The focus here is on women, the things we’re told (‘black is slimming’) and how our voices are silenced, as hers is now being on stage. She has no truck with religion – it too creates barriers and subjugates people.

The wall is erected and her head peeps through a remaining gap. There’s the suggestion of a puppet theatre in this image, emphasised earlier by the disembodied hand of an off-stage assistant re-fixing her battery pack.

Ursula reaches her hand through the gap, offering us an option that echoes her mother’s stark childhood choice. Do we stay secure in the stalls, or do we break through? It wouldn’t be a ‘Red Hanky Lady’ show without a glimpse of the body, so the selfie is a nude one, and an assistant with a video camera follows a delighted Ursula as she leaves the auditorium and then the building, capering naked into the night air, free at last and quite possibly freezing.

 

Fevered Sleep: Men and Girls Dance

Two moments make you hold your breath: a man deftly sweeping a small girl into his newspaper lair; and a man’s whispered description of the girl sitting close to him, ‘I can see a freckle just above her mouth’.

It was always going to be risky, this bringing together of grown-up male professional dancers and young girls who dance for fun. Fevered Sleep’s co-directors David Harradine and Sam Butler have long been making theatre, installations and film with and for children. They began thinking about Men and Girls Dance four years ago, with a primary interest in the opposing aesthetics of bodies at different ages, of different gender, and with different dance ability. It soon became so much more, as just the juxtaposition of the words in the title, let alone the physical presences on stage, are so laden with political and moral subtext. The conversation opened out, and the process of making the show grew with input from its supportive developers, including South East Dance.

So why a ‘newspaper’ lair? Sheets of newsprint are the backdrop, dancefloor, scenery and props on the wide stage. They are mischievous characters, concealing grown men, smothering children, forming into a Golem or a big, papery head. They are the tabloid press of course, predicated on inciting rage and fear, and the cast gets to rip them up, build harmless monsters, and vanquish demons. This push and pull runs through the whole piece, setting up a scenario that could become dangerous, then doing a switch. The man describing the girl in such forensic detail is later similarly, and just as intimately, described by a girl.

The messiness of the newspaper and the initial interactions of girls and men suggests a playground, with playmates being teased and tested, a bit of tag, some mirroring dance exercises. There is whispering and giggling in corners, bonds are being made. Chords of organ music ring out and Nina Simone sings ‘I wish knew how to be free’ as gradually a shared dance language emerges, giving the girls and men permission to hold and be held, and allowing the audience to relax.

As the relationships between the nine girls and five men get bolder, the choreography starts to include lifts and spins, rising from floor level, where the artists have been of similar height. The girls begin to dance more freely too, full of expression and their own quirky individuality, in contrast to the men who, with one exception, are all of the bearded, tattooed variety. Words become more important, the girls commanding the microphones to describe the movement, captioned live for this show by Stage Text. Some material is improvised, there is no named choreographer (dancer/maker Luke Pell is an associate artist), and the dance itself is less engaging than the interplay between the performers. Musically the piece is a mix of soundbites, quotations and lyrics, interspersed with instrumentation by Jamie McCarthy. There is variety of style to the soundscape (by Harradine and Butler) and the occasional, interesting distraction, but it lacks tonal range until near the end.

It’s the Ting Tings played loud that announces the finale, bursting out in a joyful and gymnastic series of lifts and twirls, runs and leaps, full of energy and passion. One small girl is at a point of stillness during this controlled chaos – she holds our gaze as if to say ‘it’s cool, we are all ok’.

There was always going to be a standing ovation: it’s implicit in the work and the audience profile, and it is beautiful to watch these young bodies in motion, taking risks, giving themselves to an intense and physical relationship with a big, male, stranger. The men are tender, caring and aware of their responsibility to the girls and to the work. It must have been a fascinating and fulfilling two weeks making the piece together, and rather life-changing to perform. The accompanying programme, a newspaper of course (the Brighton and Hove Edition – the girls are all local) expands the conversation with commentary and reflections from participants and observers. It’s an enlightening read.

Fevered Sleep want to create tension in the audience, to let our imaginations be fed by those tabloid headlines. In just ‘putting it out there’ they put all the risk on us – we make the dark connections. Men these days are anxious about taking their kids to the park for fear of accusing looks, and very few are applying to be teachers. We think about the child’s vulnerability and of histories kept hidden and the abuse of innocents. Of course we do. But in the show, whilst there are those moments of real unease, there is nothing so genuinely provocative as in Kabinet K’s Rauw, where children are the playthings of adults, or Gob Squad’s teenage apocalypse Before Your Very Eyes, or anything involving kids by Ontroerend Goed. It is a more tempered beast, pushing at the bars of the cage, keeping us safe.

I’ve always found Fevered Sleep’s work memorable more for its interrogation of ideas and sense of aesthetics rather than its emotional impact. An Infinite Line, On Ageing, Above Me The Wide Blue Sky are all layered and carefully constructed pieces, visually enchanting but with a certain coolness. Those watching Men and Girls Dance who were parents, or whose childhood relationships with men were either closer or more invasive than mine, might have got the goose-bumps or the lump in the throat that evaded me. Apart that is, from at those two special moments described at the start, and the lasting image of the girl with the deep, unflinching eyes.

Men and Girls Dance by Fevered Sleep is produced in association with Fuel.

 

Skye Reynolds with Jo Fong: PITCH

Shown as the second half of a double-bill with A:Version, PITCH is just that – an attempt to reveal the life of a person, in this case Skye Reynolds, to an audience. She wants to explore how an artist can take action rather than avoid it. ‘Why am I here?’ she asks, holding our gaze. ‘I need to stand out. I need help.’ I think of The Apprentice, and shudder.

In a shimmering white, textured cat-suit, designed by Anna Cocciadiferro, Skye tells us lots about herself, dancing extravagantly as she does so. She is demonstrating her worth, performing her CV, ‘I trained as barrister, became a barista’ showing us techniques learned in ashrams or in being a human animal in Edinburgh zoo for a month (as a Human Dancer with Janis Claxton Dance). Her attitude is playful but shot through with tension. It feels voyeuristic watching her crave attention and validation, dancing across the whole space in ever larger moves, fleet of foot and fluid of limb.

Having got this first pitch out of her system, Skye changes into more casual clothes and turns the spotlight on other aspects of her personal life, political and domestic. A sly humour is always just below the surface: in an imaginary recreation of Pina Bausch’s Right of Spring, we play the humbled masses, she, of course, is the virgin, in a red dress. Her political agenda seeps into the story, the causes she supports and work she has done to help those in trouble. It’s a highly verbal piece, reminiscent of Wendy Houston’s similarly intricate and cleverly worded dances, which transmits a lot of meaningful information in about twenty minutes. We get a pocket life story, we see the body dance, we listen to a recording of her daughter singing Misty. It’s a demonstration of how one can live as an artist and have an impact. Shaped by Jo Fong, PITCH leaves you with a sketch of Skye that resonates long after she has left the room, inviting us to put donations to a good cause in an empty box.

 

 

Indepen-dance 4: A:Version

Terminology can often strangle debate around work made by people with learning disabilities – or is that difficulties, or disorders? If a company has both learning and non learning disabled people is it integrated or inclusive? Whether these distinctions even matter is a hot topic, so it is great to see two dance pieces starring learning disabled dancers programmed into an important dance venue at a major arts festival. The approach to making the work is what is interesting and the particular, nonconformist nature of the dance produced. Who wants to see everyone doing the same thing in the same way? Here is originality and a different world view. Bring it on.

Like Ian Johnston’s Dancer, A: Version also takes apart the creative process, showing us a rehearsal for a piece, with all its mistakes and marking and mucking about. The company is an inclusive (their term) ensemble of four who seem comfortable with each other on stage and have an easy rapport. Where Dancer makes plain the gap between the performers ability, A:Version works around it, putting the dancers on an equal footing and working to their individual strengths.

In Adam Sloan, they have a natural comedian with brilliant timing and an assured stage presence. Neil Price brings an off-kilter and edgy energy. Haley Earlam and Emma Smith add glamour and all the contemporary dance moves you could wish for. They demonstrate the way the dance piece has been made three times, breaking it down into separate moves and sequences. The choreography is described in dance terminology undercut by more helpful terms like ‘the lifty-up bit’ with occasional digs at choreographer Laura Jones. It’s obviously a phoney set-up, it’s meta-dance after all, but the writing isn’t sharp enough here and the exchange between dancers feels rather forced.

When the dance is finally ready to show to us, with glittery costumes and a change of lighting stage, it’s magnificent. The four move with superb technique, strength and passion to an upbeat score by Garry Scott James. There are lifts, leaps and intricate footwork in a broad choreographic palette, from which Adam and Neil’s complex duet stands out. The four dancers are equally thrilling to watch, distinctions fade away, it’s a proper ensemble piece. The real-time rehearsals have obviously paid off, but the staged version could shift up a gear, be a bit less corny and have some more playful lines. I’m sure Adam can rise to the challenge.

 

A: Version was presented at Dance Base as part of a double bill with Pitch by Skye Reynolds with Jo Fong.