Author Archives: Dorothy Max Prior

Dorothy Max Prior

About Dorothy Max Prior

Dorothy Max Prior is the editor of Total Theatre Magazine, and is also a performer, writer, dramaturg and choreographer/director working in theatre, dance, installation and outdoor arts. Much of her work is sited in public spaces or in venues other than regular theatres. She also writes essays and stories, some of which are published and some of which languish in bottom drawers – and she teaches drama, dance and creative non-fiction writing. www.dorothymaxprior.com

Palestinian Circus B-Orders

Circus Hub at Edinburgh Fringe 2015

Circus Hub at Edinburgh Fringe 2015 is offering an eclectic selection of contemporary circus shows of all sorts, from bright and breezy crowd-pleasing family shows to grown-up late night spectacles, via a healthy amount of experimental and boundary-challenging work from across the globe.

The two tents, The Lafayette and The Beauty, sit in the Meadows on a site decorated in primary colours. During the day, it all looks a bit like a children’s playground. By night, multi-coloured lights focused on the white domed tents turn the site into a more outdoor festival vibe.

Due to late openings, I don’t get to see all the shows I’d hoped to in the first week of the Fringe, but eventually managed to see a good selection across the board of genres and tastes.

Lost in Translation Circus bring us The Hogwallops, in the early morning slot in the big tent (Lafayette). It’s family friendly, but certainly not a children’s show – there’s something for everyone. Inspired by Roahl Dahl’s  The Misfits, and an Italian film called Bruti, Sporchi e Cattivi (Ugly, Dirty and Bad), the show circles around a batty Hillbillly family. The homespun set gives us a rough-and-ready kitchen: wooden table, wobbly standard lamp, chests and boxes. There’s an old fashioned transistor radio, from which we hear 1930s jazz and blues, and crackly news reports about population shifts in America. And here are The Hogwallops, posing for a family photo, two younger men, one older man, and two women. There’s also a lone musician at the rear of the space, equipped with laptop, accordion and various other instruments (bongo drums, sitting rather incongruously in the kitchen, are also played at times by some of the family members). It’s not long before we’re into an energised acro routine, played out over, under and around the table. This ensemble intro develops into a skilful acrobalance duet, with the beefiest of the men basing, standing on two boxes and a ‘washing machine’ stacked up on the table, the smaller of the two women reaching legs to the roof as she stands on his shoulders, then his head. Later, the other woman does a very lovely aerial act using the grandfather character’s discarded zimmer-frame as her ‘cradle’.

Cooking features heavily: it’s Grandad’s birthday, and there’s a cake to bake. Cue flour and juggled eggs. Well, balls but I think we are supposed to take them to be eggs. Laundry too: heaps of it on ropes dangled from and run through. An hour dashes by very easily, with moments of audience participation, lots more well-executed acrobatics, and a lovely aerial duet towards the end performed with our beefy base standing on a scaffolding tower, swinging his partner through his legs and up and over his head.

The relationship between music and physical action is always well maintained, and the show bursts with vitality and humour. It’s a rumbustious romp, and I leave happy.

Also in the Lafayette, mid afternoon, is the far darker and resolutely disturbing Dolls, by Cirk La Putyka, the renowned circus/physical company from the Czech Republic – presented in Edinburgh by Aurora Nova. I’m always a sucker for shows about dolls, these strange objects of desire that reflect our own view of ourselves. The theme has been a popular one for physical theatre companies over the years – for pretty obvious reasons, I suppose, as the it offers myriad opportunities for a play on the relationship between animate and inanimate.

The setting here seems to be in some sort of dystopian future – although the house with its front missing, dominating the space from the rear, conjures images of both World War Two and the current Syrian conflict. And yes, of course – it looks like a doll’s house. The house is lit in dull ambers and blues –straw and steel. There’s a big blast, a fizz of fluorescent electric light, and smoke fills the house. Our human dolls come tumbling out. They’re a ramshackle bunch. One is dressed in what looks like Vivienne Westwood’s Seditionaries range of black trousers and jacket with straps dangling. Others are in crumpled sportswear, crusty overcoats, ripped tights. The acrobatics are delivered in a harsh, aggressive physical language – although tempered later by gentle and lyrical moments, for example in a beautiful cloud-swing section.

Throughout, the relationship between the animate and the inanimate is investigated. A mannequin called Martha becomes an object of desire. A crudely shaped puppet becomes a punchbag. A woman mothers a baby doll, fighting over it with her partner, an opportunity for a good acrobalance duet. ‘Hello, I am your father’ he says ominously to the doll, as the happy family sit at a table in their doll’s house room. The man in black becomes a human puppet, strings tied to his ankles and wrists, pulled hither and thither by the other four performers. the term ‘hand-to-hand balancing’ takes on new meaning as a man and a woman have their arms bound together.

The action moves between the floor, the air, and the doll’s house set. Sexual politics are on the table: at times, the piece feels like a demented punk version of a Punch and Judy show. And there is a superb acro to aerial duet between a man and a woman playing dolls alternately. She has an extraordinary ability to stay stiff and lifeless, as, wrapped in clear plastic, she is hoisted on her partners shoulders like a toy he has stolen, and one painstaking movement at a time, pulled up into the air for a doubles trapeze act like no other. The tables are turned nicely as she descends, and his body then freezes up.

Be warned, although a daytime circus show, this is a disturbing and unnerving piece of work. Cirk La Putyka create a dark and dangerous stage world, and inhabit it with full commitment. Shock and awe, in equal measure.

Later in the Lafayette, the big and beefy Cirque Alfonse from Quebec present Barbu. It’s butch and brash and makes no claims to being anything other than good solid circus entertainment. The four men at the core at the action are all solidly built, and a lot of the acro action and comic play is built around this fact. The skills are sound, no doubt about that –  top notch. They create human towers and pyramids galore, spin expertly in cyr wheels, juggle, and do a mean teeterboard act. There are also two women performers, who perform in the traditional circus female roles: hanging circ/hoop; being swung around by the men, on or off roller blades; or being the ‘magician’s assistant’ in a version of the classic Cabinet of Swords. The magician is a geeky type of guy who ends up being tied up and humiliated. There are screens to the side, showing close-ups of parts of the human body; or waving flowers, birds or bees. I’m not sure why. There is also a feisty live band, playing what I take to be Quebecois music which I enjoy – a kind of rousing electro-folk that at times reminds me of Irish folk-rock band Horslips. It’s all high energy and jolly good fun. Not my cup of tea for the most part as, to be honest, as I find a lot of the messages about gender divide and masculinity a wee bit disturbing – but filling a necessary slot for the up-for-it late evening crowd, who if not at the circus would be filling the cabaret, sketch comedy and stand-up shows.

Over in the smaller tent, Beauty, I see two very different shows.

Les Inouis is the new show by Total Theatre Award nominated company T1J, who are also presenting that earlier show, L’Enfant Qui at L’Institut Francais d’Ecosse. And when I say new, I mean painfully new. It feels fresh and tentative, almost to0 early in its process to review. It tells the story of a migrant washed up on shore. And how great to see circus tackling an urgent subject of the moment. It weaves the story of this nameless man, imagined by the girl who finds his dying body, with a bigger story of migration and environmentalism. Seeing his body on the beach, with a plastic bag over his head, we are immediately reminded of all the stories of wildlife killed by trash in the sea. The famous bicycles of the Calais ‘jungle’, a makeshift migrant city, are suggested by a unicyclist moving around the space at the start of th epiece, as three washed-up bodies lie on the ‘beach’ next to two carved wooden dolphin. But the image of the bicycle also suggests an environmental message of a need to abandon the pursuit of oil for cars.

As with L’Enfant Qui, this new show is far from being a regular circus piece. It merges circus skills, puppetry, animation and spoken text. The text tells a story of a border crossing with a wagon filled with caged birds. The birds can’t cross, because they don’t have the right documents. Their carer opens the cages and they fly across the border. The central puppet is a human-size figure that alternates cleverly with a real human playing the migrant on the shore. The simple but effective animation, with human interaction from behind the translucent material that form the screen, is used to tell the story – from both a human and an animal perspective – of a journey across the ocean. The movement work is sound, with some strong acrobalance sections. There is a beautiful slack wire act on which a woman gives birth to a puppet baby – it fits beautifully into the piece, suggesting the shaky vulnerability of women migrants giving birth whilst in transit. A cyr wheel act, on the other hand, is skilful but doesn’t seem to fit the narrative – always the dilemma in circus-theatre: what takes precedence, presenting the skills or telling the story? There’s a big ensemble act inside a kind of rolling metal cube. Caged wild humans or caged wild animals? It suggests both, and works very well.

Les Inouis is a show that is already interesting and thought-provoking. With the necessary time to develop, it will no doubt grow into a winning piece of cross artform circus-theatre.

Last but not least – Palestinian Circus’ B-Orders is a delight. ‘Imagine a world without borders and a life without prejudice’ is its tagline. It is created and performed by Ashtar Muallem and Fadi Zmorrod, both totally engaging onstage.

It’s political, but not in an agit-prop kind of way. Do this, do that say the words projected onto the back of the space (hard to read without the total blackout needed). Don’t talk to strangers. Think about your future.  It is about the restrictions of living in occupied Palestine, yes – but it is about so much more too. Gender, for example. The shame of getting your first period. Being told to cover yourself; that acrobatics is no game for a girl. Always cast as the victim. Being a boy who is assumed to be causing trouble, defying authority. Always cast as the aggressor.

The pair use dance, acrobatics, Chinese Pole and silks in the telling of their story of the desire to break free of the boundaries of nationality, gender, religion. And object animation and manipulation: each has a pile of bricks that are used to build walls, and houses, and human figures; to throw and kick; and to use as stepping stones to walk over to each other. Their onstage relationship is beautiful, poignant. They are all things to each other: sibling, friend, alter-ego, lover. Sometimes, she is on silks and he is on the Chinese Pole. Then they duet on the pole, a series of soft and melifluous moves. Poetry in motion!

Also at Circus Hub are a couple of Total Theatre favourites. Ockham’s Razor are here, as are last year’s Total Theatre Award for Circus, Barely Methodical with Bromance. Not seen yet, but hopefully caught later in the run, Are two shows that come recommended from those in the know in the new circus milieu:  Elephant in the Room, and La Meute. There’s also a children’s circus show called Trash Test Dummies, and Limbo! a good-time spectacle returning to the Edinburgh Fringe for another, no doubt successful, run.

So take your pick, and roll up, roll up to the Circus Hub.

Featured image: Palestinan Circus: B-Orders

The Underbelly’s Circus Hub is at The Meadows, as part of the Edinburgh Fringe 2015, throughout August. www.underbellyedinburgh.co.uk

For Dolls and B-Orders, also see www.auroranova.org

 

 

Here is the news from over here

Lorne Campbell and collaborators: Here is the News from Over There

Or, to give it its full title: Here is the News from Over There (Over There is the News from Here), a Borderless Twitter Ballad from the Middle East, which follows on from last year’s romping success The Bloody Great Border Ballad Project, also led by Northern Stage’s director Lorne Campbell, with playwright David Grieg on board as dramaturg. Last year it was Scotland. This year, the emphasis is on the Middle East, the project featuring new writing, provocations and performance from over 20 artists and writers from Egypt, Syria, Algeria, Palestine, and Iraq (amongst other countries) together with artists based in the UK whose heritage is linked to the Middle East and/or the Arab world (which are not the same thing, we are reminded).

Let’s begin at the end: We’re here to create a song that will build nightly throughout the Fringe. We learn the chorus. It goes ‘ Aha aha oh oh, Aha aha oh oh – sheb-sheb, sheb-sheb!’ And what does sheb-sheb mean? Flip-flop. Congratulations, you have your first word in Arabic…

Building up to this moment is a rather chaotic – but yes, that is par for the course – mix of readings of short stories or other texts, and a reconstruction of a notorious interview on Egyptian TV.

It’s all held together, sort of, by compere Abdel Rahim Alawiji, a Lebanese man in a kilt who has the vibe of a stand-up comedian, but is in fact a writer of short fiction and film scripts, aided and abetted by Egyptian woman writer who might be called  Sabrina, who is not credited in the programme notes for the day (today’s show has something of an Egyptian bias). Each night will be different, but what we get first at this, the opening show, is a short story called Cairo Taxi Driver, read with the help of an audience member as passenger, and footage on the large screen behind them of the chaos of Cairo in the rush hour, where (we learn) the way to cross the road is to look the car drivers steadily in the eye and never lose nerve.

We next hear five or six short pieces by Palestinian writer (again, information is not easy to track down) which include a very poignant short story of a boy playing with a balloon in an alley, the balloon bursting as a group of Israeli soldiers enter the alleyway…

Today’s special guest Hassan Abdul Razzak presents a reconstruction of a TV interview with an Egyptian self-proclaimed atheist, who blogs and posts on YouTube. This interview is an affront to good broadcasting, with the interviewer turning on her interviewee and accusing him of abandoning his faith and thus his country. An expert, a psychologist, is brought in to offer pronouncements on how misguided this young man is; how he things he understands how things are, but his information is false. ‘Scientists propagating Darwinism are mostly Jewish’ this so-called expert says at one point.

What’s extremely interesting about this interview is how familiar the language of his accusers is. He is, apparently, under the influence of people who are corrupting his mind. He is spending too much time on the internet browsing suspect websites that are trying to radicalise young people. He comes from a good home, but he has rejected his parents and they don’t understand how this could have happened (his mother is brought into the debate in a phone  interview!). Yes, we’ve heard it all before – but  the evil terror that we are hearing about over here is ‘Islamism’ not ‘atheism’.  Interesting, very interesting.

Behind all this, at the back of the stage, is a whole crowd of people doing who knows what on laptops. Plus a woman weaving on a loom, live, images of her busy-fingered activity sometimes projected onto the screen. Plus to the side the cast of Third Angel’s The Paradise Project, who have been drafted in to play bit parts in the readings. It’s a great big glorious mess, and it will grow and grow. Future guest performers will include playwright David Grieg, Daniel Bye, Tassos Stevens, Nazli Tabatabai-Katambbakhsh from Zenzeh, Amit LaHav from Gecko, and Nir Paldi from Theatre ad Infinitum.

So I can’t say what you’ll see and hear, but I can say it’ll be an interesting mix. And I have given you a head start with the song, as you now know the chorus.

All together now:

‘Aha aha oh oh, Aha aha oh oh – sheb-sheb, sheb-sheb!’

 

Presented nightly at 23.10, Northern Stage at Summerhall. Information on special guests will be posted on www.northernstage.co.uk/edinburgh

 

 

 

Bruit-de-Couloir. Photo Michel-Nicolas

Clement Dazin: Bruit de Couloir

A young man moves across the stage, walking along a corridor of light, slowly and carefully placing each foot, his hands busy juggling three white balls in a tight little circle, the balls illuminated in the semi-darkness, and taking on a life of their own: a kind of automata; a perpetual motion machine.

The stretching and conflating of time is a strong theme in the piece. Once, time was seen as an absolute. Einstein’s theory of relativity changed all that, as science took on what philosophers and mystics had known forever: time is elastic. Anyone who has known a moment of crisis has the experience of everything almost standing still as the impact hits. Or, on a more mundane level, of time whizzing by when we are busy. And of how time shifts as you age – at one point we hear a voice-over of recorded text, in which an older person says ‘ …how fast it flies…’

In this adept and accomplished solo piece that combines object manipulation (of the circus sort) and dance (of various sorts, including contemporary and hip-hop), Clement Dazin explores time and motion. At times he leaps and flies and spins, sometimes without, but mostly with, one, two, three, four, or more juggling balls in tow. He leaps, he catches, he dives. At other times, he moves the juggling balls with almost unbearable slowness around his body, kneeling to the side of the empty space, a focused light highlighting his pale face and hands, and the white balls that slide along his arm or around his neck. A beautiful chiaroscuro painting in flesh and light. The lighting design throughout is minimal but beautiful. Corridors of light, squares of light on the floor, a row of blue lights at the back of the stage, beams of light focusing on the performer. Often, Dazin stops moving and just stands in the light. So good to see peace and quiet on a stage!

The excellent soundscape (by Gregory Adoir) supports and complements the physical action. A drone, a cello. Murmurings of crowds, and the occasional short burst of recorded voice. Ticking clocks and ringing bells marking the passing of time. The traffic sounds and sirens from outside add an interesting random layer of sound design. Life goes on, outside and inside the tent. Although talking of tents, it does seem that this show belongs in a regular theatre space with proper blackout, not a circus tent that has been disguised as an end-on black box studio theatre.

I read in my programme notes that Bruit de Couloir is inspired by NDE (Near Death Experience). Which isn’t particularly clear when you watch it, but makes sense once you know.

A thoughtful piece of work, expertly performed by Dazin, who is a graduate (2012) of the National Centre of Circus Arts in France. – and it is always good to see quiet, reflective circus work. At just 35 minutes, a brief work – but feeling complete. Time held captive for a short while, a welcome respite from the hurly burly of life at the Edinburgh Fringe.

Bruit de Couloir is presented by Crying Out Loud and Vive le Fringe! at Institut Francais d’Ecosse as part of the Edinburgh Fringe 2015.

 

Fiction

David Rosenberg / Glen Neath: Fiction

‘The numbers on your headphones should match the numbers on your seats.’ There’s a slight air of anxiety as people try to find their seats, which aren’t in numerical order. We notice as we sit that although it is a sell-out show, there is no-one in the seat to either side of us. whole columns are empty. So friends are separated, and we each sit alone with no human contact, staring at a screen. ‘This is your last chance to leave’ warns the screen. We see some photos of a bland hotel room. A bed, two chairs, light fittings, a nondescript ornament or two. The lights dim, we’re in the dark. Total blackout, not even an emergency exit light.

Then the voices start, far away at first, then very close. The person whispering in my ear is called Julie. You have to imagine that with a French accent. Julie. She is apparently taking care of me. We are in a hotel room. There is a conference speech to be written urgently. An ornament is broken – I was dozing but the crash woke me up. Julie is arguing with someone about me. I’m taken into a lift, where she apparently has to bribe the lift operator. Now I’m in a car. The goalposts keep changing. More noises. Other voices, engines running, crunching footsteps, the patter of rain. The rain stops, but the windscreen wipers carry on, regardless. We cut from one place to another. Indoors morphs into outdoors with no clear logic. It’s a film script. It’s a dream.

The thing this show most reminds me of is the experimental drama slot on Radio 3 on Sunday evenings, listened to under the covers. Radio, as we know, is a highly visual medium. The power of words whispered in your ear to conjure images, this is what’s at work here. Sometimes it goes beyond the radio effect, becomes a whole-body visceral experience as the room itself shakes and shudders.

Writer Glen Neath and director David Rosenberg are upfront in their objective to induce a state of shared dreaming in the audience. They stand on the shoulders of many other writers and directors who explore a dream-state of heightened reality chock full of puzzling non-sequiturs. Lynch. Saramago. Kafka. Murakami. Add a dash of Film Noir and French Nouvelle Vague into the mix. Or Nouvelle Vague Film Noir, even. Alphaville, especially. To steal a line from Murakami, Fiction takes us to edge of Kafka’s shore, and leaves us there, pondering. What does it all mean? Everything and nothing.

Fiction is one of a number of theatre-in-the-dark productions at the Edinburgh Fringe – Daniel Clark’s Earfilms is also playing as part of the British Council Showcase, for example. I’d say it’s a growing trend – but then I remember that BAC programmed a whole season of (literally) dark theatre at least a decade ago, possibly two. It’s an ongoing trend – and the advances in technology make for evermore sophisticated manifestations. Rosenberg seems to be making works using binaural headphones his thing. And more than that, his fascination with the Peeping Tom / Rear Window and other voyeuristic / pulp fiction cinematic motifs goes right back to his earlier work with Shunt in shows such as Amato Saltone.

Not for the feint-hearted. Or the claustrophobic.. Someone had to be taken out by an usher with a torch at the show I was in., which was a nice moment of unplanned theatre. Or maybe it always happens, who knows.

A rollercoaster ride of Artaudian theatre of the senses for those who dare.

Goodnight. Sleep tight.

 

Fiction by David Rosenberg and Glen Neath is presented by Fuel at the British Council Edinburgh Showcase 2015.

 

 

 

 

Souvenirs

The Human Animal: Souvenirs

‘One man’s trash is another man’s treasure’ is the tag line for Souvenirs. There’s a pile of boxes and shelves at the rear of the performance space, boasting a hotch-potch of everyday objects and ornaments, looking very much like a display in any one of the many Edinburgh charity shops just five minutes walk away on Nicholson Street. There are also old newspapers in the space, and three people sat in child-like (or teddy-bear, perhaps) poses, with roughly decorated cardboard boxes on their heads. They burst out and name themselves: One, Two, Three. They dash around in high spirits, playing games of various sorts, a nice evocation of the golden years of mid-childhood – those years when your old enough to be allowed outside for long spells, building camps and forming gangs.

There’s a new girl on the block, they name her Four, but she’s not sure she wants to take on the tag. She does, though, want to be one of the gang – but to be accepted she has to fulfil a dare. Break into the Birdman’s house and steal a jammy dodger.

She does – and she finds a lonely single man with stories to tell. His memories are evoked by the ensemble, who have now become (variously) his legendary journalist grandfather, his new-age poet mother, and his boyhood best friend turned lover.

It’s a story that has precedents – literature is full of these odd-bod adult/child confessional relationships, from Pip and Mrs Haversham onwards. Which is no bad thing – it’s an eternally interesting theme. I don’t have any gripe with the essential story, although feel it needs work. The key dramaturgical problem is the age of the child bearing witness – the tone of the game-playing, and the jittery physicality of the mock-children, has set up the suggestion that she is around 7 or 8 years old, perhaps 9 tops – but once in the company of the Birdman, she becomes someone far older, offering reflections and words of wisdom that would be pretty grown-up even for a teenager.

The writing is rather erratic – and it is thus not a surprise to see four writers (none of them the performers) credited on the play, along with a director and two producers. For this is a play, developed in association with Freshblood New Writing – despite its listing in the Dance and Physical Theatre sections of both the Edinburgh Fringe brochure and Zoo’s own marketing. It is a piece of new writing delivered by a young ensemble, who use add-on physical/visual theatre tricks as illustration of the text, rather than as the means to tell the tale. The promised object play is pretty old-school physical theatre – newspapers becoming masks or fluttering bird-like around; lengths of cloths becoming wings etc – although done well, and I do enjoy this aspect better than the poorly executed sections of early Complicite style hero-chorus movement work (slo mo movement across the stage; bodies lifted aloft – you know the sort of thing). No one on stage seems to have any particular aptitude for movement work, and there seems to be a mistaken belief that physical theatre is all about running around a lot, rather than it being what emerges from a performer trained in the use of their body as the storytelling medium.

The six onstage performers tear around the space morphing from one character to another, or providing ensemble support to other character’s stories. I do wish, though, that they had been discouraged from their terribly actor-ly acting. Their voices boom and project out into a small space that really doesn’t need this, and despite their proximity to us in this small space, with no divide between performers and audiences, our existence is never acknowledged. There are a couple of sections of monologue where the text is delivered over our heads into the void beyond. I suppose that’s what they teach you at acting school. It might work on a massive stage, but here it is just plain weird.

Apart from feeling strangely ignored as an audience member, fourth wall firmly intact, I also feel the whole show is just so busy that I’m starting to feel giddy and over-stimulated. So much needs cutting down, refining, carving into something more cohesive. It’s a text-based piece, and finding ways to deliver that text in a more cohesive, less shouty, and less busy way within the interesting scenographic context (the junk aesthetic, which I like a lot) would be the way forward, I feel.

To end on a positive note: the live music is good – always great to see live music in theatre and our multi-instrumental here works it well, with a mix of keyboards, recorder, guitar and floor tom, sometimes pure and simple, and sometimes looped. And the ensemble have to be commended for their physical energy and commitment.