Author Archives: Dorothy Max Prior

Dorothy Max Prior

About Dorothy Max Prior

Dorothy Max Prior is the editor of Total Theatre Magazine, and is also a performer, writer, dramaturg and choreographer/director working in theatre, dance, installation and outdoor arts. Much of her work is sited in public spaces or in venues other than regular theatres. She also writes essays and stories, some of which are published and some of which languish in bottom drawers – and she teaches drama, dance and creative non-fiction writing. www.dorothymaxprior.com

Berlin: Bonanza

Berlin: Bonanza

Berlin (who come from Belgium, not Germany!) are known to Total Theatre for their previous UK appearance with the complex and intriguing Land’s End, seen at the Brighton Festival 2012 – part large-scale installation, part film, and part live performance. That show investigated the life and crimes of a town that was sited on the border of France and Belgium, with one house dissected into two nationalities.

Bonanza, a far smaller scale work, is another part of what is a trilogy of shows investigating various takes on small-town mentality – shows which have a definite nod in the direction of the work of David Lynch in their eerie dissection of seemingly ‘normal’ people and landscapes. Unlike Land’s End, this piece features no live performers (unless you count the off-stage technician).

The show caused consternation amongst some audience members and critics who saw it as documentary film rather than ‘theatre’, so let’s just settle this by saying that actually it was neither – it was a piece of time-based live art. It is a piece of fixed duration, set in a theatre space, rather than a wander-in-and-out affair. The audience face a stage dressed with five screens squared up to five projectors and, set on a tilted platform above them, a model village of little wood cabins lit by twinkling lights.

This village – nay, town – is Bonanza, Colorado. Population: seven permanent residents who live in five houses (so one screen per household, lined up under the model of their house) plus there’s a few people who own summer houses, making a voting population of 14. It’s an extraordinary piece of work that (like Land’s End) investigates the weirdness beneath the surface of everyday life. It has resonances with Von Trier’s Dogville, although nothing quite as terrible happens here.

Nevertheless, Bonanza turns out to be a place filled with political and personal intrigue; a microcosm of how the world works. At the beginning, everything is hunky dory. We meet our residents, depicted on screen – sometimes one screen per house or tracking one person’s journey outside; sometimes all screens showing the same image; then again, a Google Earth zoom in from afar; or a still image of a desolate but beautiful landscape. At least, an image that is seemingly still: in one beautifully framed and held shot, a man and a dog are standing stock still in front of a copse of trees, and we suddenly notice that it isn’t a still, the dog’s tail is moving ever so slightly.

‘Don’t believe anything you hear and only half that you hear’ flashes up onscreen as a warning – what seems to be a simple story of simple country folk grows ever more complex and intriguing. Bird-watching, morning walks (‘I never wear a watch – it’s either sun up or sun down’), and Sunday prayers giving way to witchcraft rivalry (‘she works more on the astral plane than me’), vicious feuds with neighbouring town Pueblo, consorting with elves, cabin fever, illness, divorce, and political intrigue at the town board meeting at the Bonanza Fire House (we aren’t allowed in: the five screens show the same image of a shuttered door with murmurings behind it).

Paradise lost or hell on earth? The jury is out. A beautiful, haunting and troubling piece of work.

 Bonanza won a Total Theatre Award 2013 for Innovation, Experimentation and Playing with Form.

Brokentalkers: Have I No Mouth

Brokentalkers: Have I No Mouth

To the tune of Roy Orbison’s In Dreams our three performers enter the space – there’s Feidlim Cannon (actor, director and co-founder of Brokentalkers theatre company) playing himself, his mother Ann playing herself, and an actor (introduced as Alan) playing their psychotherapist Eric Keller and other roles. The absent character at the heart of the show is Sean Cannon, father of Feidlim, husband of Ann. What plays out over the next 75 minutes is a beautiful, disturbing, and inspiring exploration of bereavement, loss, and grief. For all the heartbreak presented, it is ultimately life affirming – and a marvellous example of how terrible, painful life events can be explored in a theatrically successful way. Be warned: you’ll be left Crying along with Roy as the cast take their bows…

We start with a ‘not very good’ (Feidlim’s words) piece of video art, in which he tries to capture something of Sean’s spirit by filming a glass of Guinness placed in various locations (pubs, parks) beloved of his father. We also learn pretty quickly that there is a second absent character in this story: Little Sean, the youngest son of the family, who died not long after birth. There’s some very lovely questioning of how memory and imagination intertwine as Feidlim tells us that he remembers being lifted up to peer through the glass window at the hospital nursery to see his new baby brother, and Ann tells us – and him – that this couldn’t have happened. Little Sean (and the surviving middle son, Pádraig) are represented onstage by life-size photos pasted onto cardboard cut-outs.

One of the lovely aspects of the show is the constant re-casting of people, objects, and images. Feidlim plays himself but sometimes speaks Ann’s words. Alan is mostly the psychiatrist, but later morphs into an eerily bandaged Sean Cannon. Pádraig’s recorded voice features later, and baby Sean is not only a cardboard cut-out but also a doll – a Chucky doll, says Feidlim in disgust, accusing his mother of morbidity in her choice of objects (the doll is inside a cardboard box, representing the child’s coffin, which Feidlim hates). The story of his father Sean’s unnecessary and ultimately fatal hospital operation is played out with one of those horrid Operation Rescue Kit boardgames. Photos, fake snow and balloons also feature…

Whilst the story is ostensibly about the deaths of Sean senior and junior and the bereavement process, what it turns out to be mostly about is the mother-son relationship. Through fantastically drawn detail, Ann is framed onstage (by Feidlim’s words, through her own words, and in her remarkable calm and focused physical presence) as a wonderfully complex character: a Reiki practitioner who loves the colour purple and Australian soap operas; and then again a traditional Irish Catholic mother who teaches her children to cross themselves when they pass a church and who puts holy water on batteries to revive them.

Feidlim meanwhile rants against the world – terrified that he’ll be viewed as a ‘fucking Norman Bates still living with me mam’ in his thirties, and still feeling the pain of his dad’s foolish promise to his eldest son that he’ll ‘never die’.

One of the really interesting aspects of the show is the interaction between the three different performance modes – here we have an actor-director using his own autobiographical material, a non-actor performing, and an actor playing real characters in the other two performers’ stories. It’s Quarantine’s Susan and Darren and then some.

It’s a weird thing, painful personal memoir (on page or stage). Once you decide to put it out there, then it becomes your art, not just your life – and you have to be willing to craft it in a way that makes it something other people can own too. Have I No Mouth does this very effectively – a brilliant show, a worthy winner of a Total Theatre Award 2013.

 

Adrienne Truscott: Asking For It

Let’s Talk About Rape! Taboo or not taboo at Ed Fringe

Hello Edinburgh! Everyone alright? Having a good time? So hey – here we are seeing a few shows, and what do you know? People just won’t shut up about rape. It’s out there. We all know it’s out there in the big bad world. But I mean it’s really out there at the Edinburgh Festival Fringe 2013, and issues around taboo and what is or isn’t acceptable on stage have been hot topics, onstage and off – in theatre, in comedy, and in the spaces inbetween.

Taking an ironic approach to the subject of rape is Adrienne Truscott, one half of the circus/cabaret act Wau Wau Sisters, who wins the prize for the longest and most cumbersome show title on the Total Theatre Awards shortlist: Adrienne Truscott’s Asking for It: A One-Lady Rape About Comedy Starring Her Pussy and Little Else!

 She starts her show naked from the waist down – although her head is well dressed, resplendent in a trademark Wau Wau blonde wig. She’s bright and breezy and she bounces round the small space welcoming her audience. ‘Anybody here been raped? Anyone rape anybody?’ she asks, in a wide-eyed, disingenuous Marilyn mode. No rapists in the audience? Well that’s odd, because statistically that’s unlikely – they must all be at someone else’s show. Maybe someone somewhere, muses Adrienne, is doing a show to a whole room full of rapists.

A madcap hour ensues, a mix of sharp-witted subversion (she does a hilarious role-play scene with a male audience member about saying no), comic mockery, and a savage critique of the current trend for rape jokes amongst some male stand-up comedians. Playing the scatty blonde bombshell, she creates a comic persona who can stick the darts in with a smile on her face – her naming and shaming of American comic Daniel Tosh is brilliant (he’s the guy who, when heckled for telling a rape joke, replied ‘Wouldn’t it be funny if that girl got raped by five guys right now?’) The point that Adrienne Truscott makes brilliantly, comically, is that regardless of what you feel about what is or isn’t taboo in comedy, he failed spectacularly in how he dealt with the heckle. He just wasn’t funny. Adrienne shows us what he could have done instead… I’m interested in the Tosh controversy, and the issues it raises around taboo (or not taboo) in comedy, so I do a bit of Googling after seeing Adrienne’s show. I discover that after his infamous retort, Tosh tweeted: ‘the point i was making before i was heckled is there are awful things in the world but you can still make jokes about them.’ Yes Daniel – but you wouldn’t tell a racist joke about blacks being attacked, and then if an Afro-American in the audience challenged you, say something like: ‘Wouldn’t it be funny if five white guys lynched this black guy right now?’

So let’s leave Tosh blustering and justifying and get back to Adrienne Truscott, who magnificently fights bad comedy with good comedy. Fight them on their own terms, that’s the way to do it! The jokes and raps and skits are all jollied along by various plays on dressing and undressing that involves multiple bras and wigs (and a nice spotty dress that she needs help squeezing into), and some witty and waggish interactions between film projections and the naked parts of Ms Truscott’s anatomy (pussy beards – I’ll say no more). Sitting somewhere between comedy and performance art, the show is a clever challenge to stereotypical ideas about rape, and an interesting critique of the male gaze – although to play devil’s advocate, I’d also say that its success is aided by the fact that she has the sort of body our society deems to be fit and attractive. A body which she has the right to display in a performance context in any way that she wishes, I hasten to add – but just noting that there might be a very different audience response if a different sized/aged female body were to be on display. She doesn’t win a Total Theatre Award but her consolation prize is the Foster’s Comedy Awards Panel Prize (which comes with a £5,000 cheque). As we are mentioning the Fosters, we can also note here that ‘feminist’ stand up comedian Bridget Christie was the overall winner.

At the other end of the spectrum, Nirbhaya is a serious look at rape, murder and extreme abuse of women. The show’s title is taken from the name given to the then-anonymous victim of the infamous case of rape and brutal physical assault on a Delhi bus that resulted in the death of the woman thirteen days later. The word means ‘fearless’ and the young woman, who had suffered the most appalling attack, violated in every horrible way you could imagine by six men wielding metal rods, became a symbol of resistance and protest for thousands of Indian women (and men). The woman is named at the end of the show, despite the fact that under Indian law it is not considered acceptable to name the victim of a rape. Her story acts as the nucleus of the play, around which circles stories of other abused Indian women, their stories ranging from childhood sexual abuse by ‘uncles’ to a woman whose lips are cut off for taking part in a Bollywood movie audition and allowing a stage kiss with a male actor. To make sure that this is not seen as exclusively an Indian problem, the story of an Indian woman gang-raped in America is included in the piece.

Nirbhaya

Nirbhaya 

So how do you critique a show like this? For some, the subject matter, the importance of this story, is enough to justify its existence, and making any commentary on how it works theatrically is problematic. For me, there are criticisms of it to be made of it as a piece of theatre, and if the story is presented as theatre then it has to be critiqued on those terms. So here goes…

The staging is safe and familiar territory – I can understand why the aesthetic decisions on soft lighting and tasteful visuals got taken, but there is an odd jarring between the harsh stories told and the theatrical playing out of them. There’s lots of post-Complicite walking on diagonals (to denote the streets of Delhi), and some well delivered but rather old-fashioned hero-and-chorus ensemble scenes (the actual bus rape scene is totally pointless – trying not to be too graphic or offensive, it offends in its tastefully passé physical theatre styling). Verbatim texts are delivered downstage in the spotlight by the cast (who have various degrees of professional performance skill), all in turn telling their own story  – other than the actor playing the dead victim from Delhi who switches from in-character acting to playing a kind of singing narrator/witness of the others’ stories, and the one male actor in the show who plays the bus victim’s companion, various abusers, a victim’s lost son, and finally a kind of Indian male everyman, standing with his female compatriots against the abuse of women happening in his country.

There are serious questions to ask about the way the theatre piece is used as a kind of conduit for public witnessing, therapy even. (Although it is not the only show to do this – see also the Total Theatre Award winning Have I No Mouth, far more successful theatrically, in my view). In one of the most harrowing scenes in Nirbhaya, a scarred (physically and mentally) victim of appalling abuse weeps openly as she tells her tale of being beaten, doused in kerosene, and set on fire by her husband. Her scars are there for us to see. Yes, it’s her choice but no, I’m not comfortable with this. Good, some may say – feel uncomfortable. But I’m convinced I’m feeling uncomfortable for the wrong reasons. I feel attacked, caught by the throat. I’m desperate for a bit of good old-fashioned Brechtian alienation. There are other ways than this, I feel.

Taking a totally different approach to the theatrical dilemma of addressing real-world oppressions and abuses come Belarus Free Theatre whose Trash Cuisine uses a variety show cum cookery programme frame to highlight the many forms of man’s inhumanity to man (and woman), a show principally about capital punishment and torture which takes in genocide, rape and murder along the way. The cookery theme also forces us to look at our attitude towards animal farming and cruelty. I’m much happier with this more detached approach to its ghastly subject matter, enjoying the horrible humour and irony, being startled into hearing and learning things I didn’t previously know, and reappraising things I did know, but it would seem to be one of those Marmite shows. I loved it, many hated it.

I ended up wondering how Belarus Free Theatre might have dealt theatrically with the Delhi rape and murder case as subject matter.  I was desperate for some between-the-lines questions to be introduced into the narrative of Nirbhaya: the collusion of women (mothers and mothers-in-law most often) in the horrific physical and sexual abuse of young women, for example. And here’s something to be discussed: the accused driver of the bus, Ram Singh, died in police custody on 11 March 2013. The police say he hanged himself – defence lawyers and his family suspect he was murdered, possibly after beating and torture. Who cares – no less than he did to another human being, say some. But to stand up and defend the human rights of those who behave appallingly – there’s the challenge. One thing I loved about Trash Cuisine was its unequivocal opposition to torture and the death penalty, no matter what, whilst yet flagging up some of the awkward questions that raises, including the difficult (for some) question that many of the people we – the liberal West, the Amnesty supporters – are trying to gain clemency for are people who have tortured, raped, abused, murdered others. But that’s the ultimate test, isn’t it? Love has redemptive powers – love your enemies, love those who harm you. That’s what Martin Luther King said, and I suspect he was quoting one Jesus of Nazareth.

Fight them with love, or fight them with comic wit and irony and a few vaudevillian songs and dances – the choice made by Adrienne Truscott, Belarus Free Theatre, and other of my Fringe 2013 favourites such as Theatre Ad Infinitum, whose Ballad of the Burning Star deals with the most difficult of subjects armed with a man in drag, a chorus of dancing girls, and an hour’s worth of scathing humour.

As for the question of taboo, I’d steal a line from Rachel Mars and say nothing is out of bounds in theatre or comedy – it’s the way you tell them that counts.

Total Theatre Awards 2013 Winners Announced

Total Theatre is delighted to announce the winners of the Total Theatre Awards 2013. Over the course of this year’s Edinburgh Festival Fringe we have assessed 360+ shows from which a shortlist of 32 nominated shows was announced on 16 August 2013.

Following this the nominated shows were viewed by a panel of judges who have awarded six Awards across three categories – one Award for an Emerging Company, two Awards for Visual/Physical Theatre and three Awards in Innovation, Experimentation and Playing With Form. The judges also considered a number of late opening shows, however due to the quantity of eligible shows it was not possible to apply Total Theatre’s rigorous assessment and judging process in full and thus no discretionary judges award has been awarded this year. One Significant Contribution award has also been awarded.

The Award Winners are:

Shows by an Emerging Company/Artist

Sh!t Theatre’s JSA (Job Seekers Anonymous) 2013 (England)

Sh!t Theatre / Escalator East to Edinburgh (Gryphon Venues at the Point Hotel)

 

Physical/Visual Theatre

L’Après-midi d’un Foehn – Version 1 (France)

Company Non Nova, presented by Crying out Loud (Summerhall)

Flown (England)

Pirates of the Carabina, presented by Crying out Loud (Underbelly)

 

Innovation, Experimentation & Playing with Form

Bonanza (Belgium)

Berlin, Big in Belgium, Richard Jordan Productions, Drum Plymouth, Summerhall (Summerhall)

 

Have I No Mouth (Ireland)

Brokentalkers (Traverse)

 

The Worst of Scottee (England)

Scottee Inc. (Assembly)

 

Significant Contribution Award

 

C!rca (Australia)

 

The judging panel for this years were: Donald Hutera (Theatre & Dance Critic, The Times), Sarah J Murray (Head of Studio, National Theatre), Matt Trueman (Freelance Theatre Critic), Matt Burman (Head of Programming and Audiences, Warwick Arts Centre), Wolfgang Hoffman (Director, Aurora Nova Productions), Professor Anthony Dean (Dean of Arts, University of Winchester), Pippa Bailey (Producer & Director), Robert Jude Daniels (Senior Lecturer in Theatre, University of Chichester), Gary Johnson (General Manager, Derby Theatre), Dorothy Max Prior (Editor Total Theatre Magazine), Jo Crowley (Producer of Total Theatre Awards).

 

Press & Industry Enquiries

 

For further information, or to arrange interviews contact

 

Jo Crowley, Producer, on 07843 274 684 / director@totaltheatre.org.uk

 

Becki Haines, Associate Producer on 07732 818401 / awards@totaltheatre.org.uk

 

Total Theatre Awards

 

Twitter: @TotalTheatreAwd

 

The Total Theatre Awards are proudly supported by:

Belarus Free Theatre: Trash Cuisine

Belarus Free Theatre: Trash Cuisine

It starts pretty low-key, with dim lights and a mellow guitar tune (played live), then into an ensemble physical theatre scene – eight people and as many wooden stools acting out motifs of restraint, disorientation and unbalance. It revs up with the arrival of a crowd-rousing compere: ‘I said HELLO Edinburgh!’ who goes into a little rap on the Scots’ love of meat – meat with meat, even. It really takes off with the first of many satirical scenes that tell stories of terror and death whilst playing out harrowing visual metaphors of the human being treated as little more than meat. So in this scene, dubbed ‘strawberries and cream’, two executioners compare notes over the dinner table on their countries’ capital punishment tactics. Person A just takes them off and shoots them in the woods, not bothering to return the bodies to the families (we presume this to be about Belarus). Person B, who seems to be representing an Asian country, says that executioners ask forgiveness of the bodies of those killed, place flowers in their dead hands, and prepare a meal for the victim’s family. It’s hard to say which is more distressing.

And so it goes – we ricochet from Belarus (the only European country to retain the death penalty) to Belfast (appalling torture only happens in faraway lands? Think again!), via Argentina, America and China.

The term ‘total theatre’ could have been invented for this show: live music that veers from soft and sultry guitar boleros to big bombastic hand-beaten drum tattoos. Spoken words: disorientating dialogue, on-mic narration by the chipper compere, and a mock stand-up comedy scene in which we are treated to ‘impressions’ of death by various means, from gas chamber (‘Hisssssssssssssssss’) to stoning (‘I’ll just do an excerpt from this one because it can take hours!’). Recorded words: on-screen statistics, pre-recorded verbatim texts, and interview material – which includes an extraordinary detailed description of the process of electrocution given by renowned human rights lawyer Clive Stafford Smith. Word-free scenes using simple but beautiful choreography – the wooden stools become a recurring motif, and there is a lovely tango dance for the Argentinean story of a ‘disappeared’ young man. Startling visual images: two naked human bodies hunched up like oven-ready chickens, decorated in fruit then rolled in black plastic body bags; two condemned boys hung from the wall. Oh and then there’s the cooking… ‘Meat is murder’ rings through the hall, in our heads if not actually in reality.

There are many shows at the Edinburgh Fringe 2013 tackling harrowing personal stories and appalling political situations worldwide. Here’s one that knows how to do it in a way that leaves the audience shocked – but in the right sort of way. Shocked to learn (or be reminded of) such atrocities, but given this information in a way that uses the tools of theatre artfully to do so – telling us about terror without terrorising us; giving us food for thought. Having worthy and shocking stories to tell is not enough if you’re a theatre-maker – it’s how you tell them that matters. Just for the record: there were many walkouts; there were people in tears; there was a well-deserved ovation. Trash Cuisine is a phenomenal piece of theatre, an extraordinary achievement from Belarus Free Theatre.