Author Archives: Miriam (Mim) King

Avatar

About Miriam (Mim) King

Miriam King is an Artist/Choreographer/Dancer/Live Artist/Filmmaker born in London , living in Brighton , working internationally. With an art school background, her professional performance career commenced in 1984. Moving from theatre through to dance, and to live art and film, her most significant training was with Anton Adasinsky's company DEREVO at their former studio in Leningrad, Russia in 1990. Miriam's work is influenced by Butoh dance. She has been creating her own unique performances since 1992, taking her to dance and live art festivals and artist-in-residences around the World. Her award winning dance film work has been shown at Lincoln Centre/ New York , Pompidou Centre/Paris, ICA/London, the Venice Biennial and at the Sydney Opera House, Australia and in every continent (excluding Antarctica ). Miriam has a continuing performance relationship with Gallery Kruh, Kostelec nad cernymi Lesy, nr Prague , Czech Republic which commenced in 1992 and an ongoing performance relationship with SoToDo Gallery , Berlin & the Congress of Visual and Performance Art.

Not Easy Company: Losing It

Not Easy Company - Losing ItThe publicity says ‘Everyone experiences loss every day from the small things to the deeper losses, whether it’s losing your keys or forgetting something…’ Up on the stage, a big jumble sale like heap of clothes lies on a table. A couple of dour looking clowns attire themselves from the mismatched forsaken garments. A red bereted figure pops up from underneath the pile and surprises us. The blond haired clown does her hair into scruffy bunches. In an ordered row are a nice collection of characterful chairs, all shapes and sizes just like our four clowns.

There are lots of positives about Losing It. It’s an unusual, visually arresting contemporary clown show, entertaining & thought provoking for adults and young alike with a dynamic soundtrack of pacy, catchy tunes composed by Jake Rousham. Rhythmically the company are very strong: bound by a good combination of shapes, sizes and visual characterisations they work well together. Ben Edmonds is a bold, self assured clown. Ezra Lynch and Elena Saorin provide contrast and foils. Michelle Lediert stands out – so very within what she was doing from the very beginning. I could have simply watched the animation of her eyebrows all evening!

I particularly enjoyed all four clowns sitting in a row, hand slapping onto their bodies. Lediert’s response to her jacket cuffs going into her face, hiking her jacket back into place at the end, stole the show. It’s these spontaneous-feeling moments that work. Other sections, and there are many, feel a little too tried and tested, as if to a formula of some sort, missing some of the freedom of clown.

I felt Losing It needed more rough edges. I didn’t lose it, despite so wanting to. Much of the performance felt tame, too controlled and sweet, a conveyor belt of sketches and routines. A greater range in its characters and their interactions would have offered some much needed shade to the lightness. For example, a bubble sequence was eye-catching, quite prophetic and symbolic. Its large bubbles were wafted up with a hand held electronic fan, offering a great opportunity for the clowns to have been more naive, intrigued by this piece of electrical equipment that going on and off. This scene was a clear example of an underdeveloped sense of play in the show, perhaps a lack of confidence that play can be enough.

Overall this enjoyable show wants some editing, using fewer sections, with more development in the extremes of each scenario. Yet it’s still early days for the production… this is only the second time the cast of clowns have done this show. I’m looking forward to seeing it ripped up a bit and run in.

Les Enfant Terribles: Ernest and the Pale Moon

Les Enfants Terribles - Ernest and the Pale MoonOne static man on the stage, rigid within a warped frame. A loud boosh! The awaiting audience startles to attention. And thus, through a gothic expressionistic style of storytelling, with live music including cello and harmonica, we are led, through black and white tones, into the tale of Gwendoline, who lives by candlelight and cannot tolerate sunlight, a solitary girl with misted eyes who loves the moon. Ernest is her admirer, a night time voyeur who believes she belongs to him. Each is alone, yet not alone, as they are accompanied in their nocturnal vigils. She is by her window, bathing in the light of her beloved moon, and he, in the shadows, from his window, gazes across at her apartment, spellbound by her every move. She has no idea he watches her, watching the moon, no idea anyone knows how she loves her moon.

Written by Oliver Lansley, it’s Tim Burton meets Edgar Allen Poe with a thick dusting of Hitchcock. With touches of Tell Tale Heart meets Rear Window, Ernest and the Pale Moon is truly gripping. Atmospheric, under swirls of dry ice and strains of cello, designed by Zoe Squire and directed by Emma Earle, the set works as an optical illusion that distorts perspective, giving a perfect frame to all four actors who, through twists and turns, deliver us a tale of diabolical obsession.

One evening, this evening that we are witnessing, Gwendoline has a visitor; a chaste visit from an invalid neighbour. Our dear Gwendoline, with eyes too sensitive for sunlight, is innocently charmed by this injured soldier who admires her and carves for her bespoke candles. She isn’t used to visitors. When Ernest sees someone at her door, his heart pounds like a mother who has lost her child on a crowded street! Gwendoline doesn’t look to the moon that night.

Ernest and the Pale Moon employs physical storytelling, inventive design and great sound effects, such as knock knocking and footsteps, to strong effect. There’s a great stair climbing sequence, as Gwendolyn goes in search of her ‘star’, where you feel the sense of the ascent through the use of tightly choreographed movement and the change of angle of a pair of sticks used as bannisters, floors and railings. Distracted by a new bright sparkle that she sees in the night sky – the torchlight of her admirer/potential murderer – she is lured into entering the apartment of Ernest… and…

Performed beautifully and precisely, in story book style, I especially enjoyed the live sound, such as a clockwork scene underscored by xylophone and metronome. We witness the story unfold from each character’s different perspective, performed fluently by actors who move skilfully between storyteller and character.

Truly feeling a sense of dread, horror and pity, some of this show made me gasp. Especially a ghastly scene of entombment, bone breaking last snatchings of breath like the last drops of steam from the kettle spout.

There’s excellent use of lighting, colour and of darkness which I relished. There’s economical use of props such a torch used for moonlight, the stars, and the flash of the blade of a knife. The stunning stage design excellently framed and held the plot. The end held a clever and unexpected twist. Pretty shocking. There were many held breaths in the audience throughout, relieved only by the final bow and a shout of ‘Bravo!’

Brian Lobel: Mourning Glory Part 2: Purge

MourningGlory-BrianLobelWe take our seats in the theatre and there on stage, behind a table with his laptop, is Brian Lobel. Above and behind him is a projection screen. Large white seconds count down one minute. Three years ago, during 50 maniacal hours spanned over five days, he played a brutal game of Facebook friendship maintenance, voted on by a judgement panel of strangers who had one minute to decide which of his 1,300 Facebook friends to sever for good or to honour. Then the deed was done! (Brian had previously informed, by email, his friends about this impending purge!).

The stage show Purge is a distillation of these fifty hours of performance and 800 ‘friend’ email responses. Brian reads to us a selection of responses. Some are amused, or intrigued, some plead not to be deleted, whilst some responses are right tetchy about being put to judgement by a panel, and 64 delete him, pre-emptively!

We, in the audience, get the chance to get in the groove with what severing electronic friendships feels and felt like. Voting cards are distributed amongst us, and as we’re read these responses we have chance ourselves to vote ‘keep’ or ‘delete’. Brian asks us questions about who would we choose to delete from our own Facebook accounts. The atmosphere is chatty, friendly, informal. People reply ‘friends’ parents’ or ‘friends’ pets!’ and shout out ‘one night stands’ and ‘old work acquaintances.’ We are given the opportunity! A man from the audience comes up on stage and live, in front of us, deletes one of his own Facebook ‘friends’. Someone he really didn’t want to be associated with.

Purge has excellent pace and clear sections, laced through with a sub plot or inner story about the death of Grant, who was an incredible writer and Brian’s first love (and the subject of installation pieces Mourning Glory Parts 1 and 3, which also played at the festival). He tells us in one-minute timed snippets about their friendship, and about their relationship via Friendster, a now defunct service, with all content lost. The show plays around with increasingly relevant questions about where online friendship stops and real friendships begin. Does the distinction between them matter?

Purge was enjoyable through all its twists and turns, Brian’s warm, informal delivery and the audience involvement created a rousing event, yet I felt indifferent most of the time and not particularly moved. The moment I most enjoyed was in the section called Dwelling where Brian invited us to close our eyes and focus our attention on the one person we could talk about for more than one minute, perhaps for an hour, all day and forever. A most gorgeous richness grew within the room in that minute: a consensus of love without the word love being used. This action certainly made me question the nature of friendship and what we value in particular friendships. And unlike the online world, for me it’s quality rather than quantity that counts.

Told By An Idiot: Never Try This At Home

NeverTryThisAtHomeTo the sound of pop music, polythene cagoules are distributed to the front two rows. Once we’ve all hushed and settled down in front of the closed stage curtains, there’s a very low key introduction from a bespectacled bloke in a white shirt. He attempts to get us warmed up, there’s a bit of a delay, he tries a lame joke… it’s all very tame. Eventually the curtains open to reveal live pop group The Coolness, all leopardskin, leotards, and leggings, loud and lewdly lunging. We are chucked back to the late 1970s and Saturday morning children’s TV.

What an extraordinarily wild and raucously chaotic evening of theatre. Never Try This at Home is centred on a fictional present-day ‘talking heads’ TV show titled Looking Back Together, a show that revels in digging up memorable ‘cultural’ moments, reuniting victims, accusers, and abusers and reminiscing about traumatic TV events and atrocities from the past. Reconciliation and atonement? Or pure high rating TV? We the audience are the real live ‘TV studio’ audience. The key event, or should we say occasion, that’s being recalled took place live on air during the Saturday morning TV show, Shushi…. which stand for ‘Say Hello Up, Say Hello…’ no-one remembers what the I stands for. With obvious parallels to real shows such as Multi-Coloured Swop Shop, Tiswas and Live & Kicking, there are exclamations of ‘Let’s run about a bit!’, chaotic, daft, vacuous leaping about, and interjections of comedy segments like Nobby’s Tool Time, Kick a Vicar, and Put him in the Stocks. Back in 1979, the perpetually-humiliated only female on the Shushi presenting team could take no more misogynistic treatment and almost succeeded in taking her own life, live on air, amid splatterings of baked beans. Scenes in freeze-frame slo-mo flashback ‘rescreening footage’ are recreated on stage. With unabashed lashings of custard pies and cruelty, it’s awful and appalling, hilarious and ridiculous, all in slick, disturbingly uncomfortable ‘now just sit back and enjoy this’ proportions.

Written before the Savile enquiry and subsequent revelations, Never Try This at Home is a bonkers high-octane show. Petra Massey excels as the swirly-patterned flared-trousered children’s TV presenter, as does Niall Ashdown as the enquiring, let’s-get-to-the-root-of-this, whatever-it-takes TV host. I really didn’t know what to expect or what I’d experience next. Wonderfully paced, performed and produced, full of awful stereotyping (racial, national and sexual), you come out wondering if it’s OK to have enjoyed such a disturbingly funny show so much… and grateful not to have sat in the first two rows.

Probe: Running on Empty

Running on Empty is Probe’s small scale experimental dance theatre show at Soho Theatre, created by a collaborative team including a writer, a choreographer, and a songwriter. This combination of voice, song, live music, dance, and story is a mix of fantasy and reality between a man and a woman, adrift in an elusive dreamtime. She is dreaming. He is dead.

After a beautiful delicate opening song, we slip into restless images, danced, performed, and spoken between Antonia Grove and Greig Cooke. The soundscape created live by Scott Smith, at times chilling and at others embracing, carries us breezing through from one chapter to another. Particularly memorable scenes were of the couple being adrift on a raft, of balance and counter balance, of who can save whom. I was engrossed by a vibrant sequence of animal spirit guides, a change of pace that opened up an atmosphere of vast plains and eternity. I enjoyed Scott Smith’s spoken interjections which gave respite, adding a touch of humour to the male-female wrangling duets.

At times strident, then lyrical, and then exhaustive, with both dancers left on the floor panting phrases such as ‘the more you struggle, the more you sink’, Running on Empty is a moody, melancholic, and tender piece about love, loss, memory, and the complexities of human relationships.

I found myself dreaming of what’s gone by, and left with the three words swift, clear, and rich.