Author Archives: Dorothy Max Prior

Dorothy Max Prior

About Dorothy Max Prior

Dorothy Max Prior is the editor of Total Theatre Magazine, and is also a performer, writer, dramaturg and choreographer/director working in theatre, dance, installation and outdoor arts. Much of her work is sited in public spaces or in venues other than regular theatres. She also writes essays and stories, some of which are published and some of which languish in bottom drawers – and she teaches drama, dance and creative non-fiction writing. www.dorothymaxprior.com

Akhe: Mr Carmen

Akhe: Mr Carmen

Akhe: Mr Carmen

The cards are drawn, and what will happen will happen. As we enter the space – a big old church with a grand high ceiling, shadows cast on rough brick walls – two men, dressed in great frock-coats and tall hats, are sat upstage behind painted lecterns, turning over playing cards and throwing them to the ground. The lecterns are hinged, and the effect is of one of those ‘head, bodies, legs’ games. The lights dim and the lecterns move forward, downstage to the very front of the stage space, opened out to become a kind of painted wall on which our two performers perch drinks and candles – candles which burn through strings, which cause things to fall… And so we are off!

In Mr Carmen, Russian ‘theatre of engineering’ supremos Akhe are up to their usual tricks. There is smoke, flame even. There are flat puppets whizzing round a wire square surrounding the space, which creates a kind of surreal boxing ring in which our two combatants in love slog it out. There are pulleys and winches, cardboard and string, water and wine, paint and sand.

This version of (or perhaps we should say homage to) Carmen goes back to the original novella by Prosper Mérimée – Carmen’s husband is written out of Bizet’s famous ‘opera comique’. It is the rivalry between men that is at the forefront of this exploration, which exploits the tragicomic aspects of the story. Carmen herself is nowhere to be seen, an elusive absence referenced with dancing dolls, roses, lipsticks, and a red chalked heart on a board.  Her name (and her lover, Jose’s name) are writ large – in glitter, in foam, in fire; as wood-block prints and in blood-red paint on crumpled brown paper.

Everywhere in this word-free piece there are visual, physical and musical allusions to the Carmen story: cigars are rolled on thighs, frockcoats opened to reveal matador-style red stockings. Andalusian trumpets sound, and a guitar is strummed with Duende passion. There is a cigarette light dance duet, a whirling all-male flamenco (beautifully absurd as danced by the burly men of Akhe), and a knife fight using a whole medley of different weapons.

As always in Akhe shows, puppetry, paper engineering and automata feature heavily, with two-dimensional and three-dimensional figures made in their own distinctive style, a kind of mulch of Russian folkloric and Dada. It goes without saying that the performances are pitch-perfect, and it all adds up to a wonderful show – Akhe at their eccentric best.

www.akhe.ru

Derevo: Mephisto Waltz

Derevo: Mephisto Waltz

Derevo: Mephisto Waltz

‘You forget that all the feelings of the world, the rains, the sounds, the cities, the birds, the people, and everything… is you,’ says Derevo’s announcement of their inspirational new ensemble work, Mephisto Waltz. Know that we are intrinsically part of everything, and that everything – good or bad – is part of us, is the message. Light and dark, life and death, sanity and madness, summer and winter, Heaven and Hell. You can’t have one without the other.

The show is a kind of history of the whole world and all it contains, with loose reference to Goethe’s Faust, and in particular the less-well-known Faust – Part II, with its story of Faust’s time in the wilderness, and the birth of Euphorion the savage bird-man who (like Icarus) flies too high and is burnt to death. Human folly has a light shone upon it, and the excesses of capitalism, religion, war, and the plundering of the natural environment are all commented upon wordlessly. Sound has a big part to play (in particular, Franz Liszt’s Mephisto Waltzes, and Holst’s The Planets suite).

Many and various are the extraordinary images that move across the stage, conjuring up illusion and allusion: here, a Nosferatu in a long black gown, with a curved nose and an enormous shadow double looming over him; there, a stage-full of whirling dervishes and waltzing women. Now a bower of flowers, and now a shower of pretty butterflies that turns into an ominous flutter of suicidal moths hitting the light (I’ve never seen butterflies as menacing creatures until this moment). A carrot-nosed snowman melts before our eyes, and a flock of egg-heads in nest-twig collars invade the stage. There’s a living scarecrow clanking cans at the birds around him, and a savage soldier tearing apart a globe to reveal its juicy (watermelon) centre – chewing on a cigar, he walks downstage muttering in a crazed no-man’s-language, to stand just inches from us, grinning insanely. (Both of these figures, and many others, are played by Derevo’s director and guiding light, Anton Adasinsky.)

Now he’s a blind scythe-bearer in a pink skirt hacking at the air, and now an old man lying on a couch, layer after layer of plastic masks stripped from his face until he remains ‘maskless’: exposed, raw, open to the realities of the world he has created.

Described by the company as ‘a gospel of dance, a personal journey and a declaration of love’, Mephisto Waltz is Derevo returning to what they do best: a strong five-person ensemble with breathtaking physical presence. It is at times impenetrable, but it is always fascinating – with moments of dark humour to throw some light into the Faustian darkness.

www.derevo.org

Hunt and Darton: The Hunt and Darton Café

If it’s Thursday it must be Edinburgh…

Hunt and Darton: The Hunt and Darton Café

So, here I am in Edinburgh, on the eve of the opening of the Fringe – it officially kicks off tomorrow, Friday 3 August. Today was planned as a quiet, settling in sort of day. Two shows booked to review (some have opened early), and maybe a bit of networking and organising. This is how it went…

11.00: I’m at the Pleasance Courtyard which is relatively quiet and calm – the Fringe hasn’t really started yet, after all. I’m here to see a children’s show, Ripstop Theatre’s Luminous Tales, which is part of the Escalator East to Edinburgh programme. I have high hopes, as Escalator is usually a mark of quality, and the show comes tagged as a Norwich Puppet Theatre production – or endorsement, at least – hard to tell for sure what the relationship actually is. It’s a bit of a disappointment – and worryingly the puppetry is below-par. I’m left feeling a bit confused, and feel the need to phone Total Theatre reviews editor Beccy Smith for a quick counselling session. She advises that I should write the review that needs to be written, regardless – so that’s what I’ll do (it’ll pop up in the reviews section soon, folks). Not a very auspicious start to my Fringe experience…

12.40 Still at the Pleasance. Now I’m off to see Pete Edward’s FAT, another Escalator show, billed as ‘the multi-media journey of a gay disabled man in search of his heart’s desire’. This one is good – thankfully. I’m thinking it might be time for lunch, but a persistent person with a bunch of flyers is insisting that I need to See Exterminating Angel at 14.00. He offers me a free ticket. I point out that if I wanted to see it  for free, I’d go and get myself a press ticket, and anyway I am pretty sure I’ve already allocated another Total Theatre reviewer to see this one. He looks at me with big soulful brown eyes and shrugs. If he’d have carried on with the sales pitch I’d have walked on, but there’s something about that shrug. I take the ticket from his hand…

14.00 Pleasance Above, Exterminating Angel. Not a reworking of the Bunuel film, but inspired by it, with a dash of Maeterlinck’s The Blind to boot. An improvised show, the action set around a never-ending dinner party – the outcome is never the same is the USP. How much is improvised, and how they go about setting their improv rules I have no idea – but it’s good, very good. Dangerously funny, edgy, and working the balance between the mundane and the surreal very cleverly. I’m glad I went, so thank you tall dark handsome stranger.

15.30 After a hurried lunch, it’s off to Fringe Central to meet the press (department). Media passes for me and the Total Theatre reviewing team sorted; spreadsheets of venue and show contacts acquired; access to computer and office facilities organised.

16.40 I’m now at C Nova – one of the newer venues of the ever-expanding C Venues empire – for Remor, a show in a box by Spanish company Res de Res. Eleven minutes of intense non-verbal performance in a mock prison cell. Take no prisoners performance you might say…

17.00 Ah, a press launch! I’ve managed to miss the Zoo Venues one but make it to the Gilded Balloon for wine and canapés. A number of keen theatre-makers try to sell me their shows: there’s the one about the wife of a porn addict and how she got divorced and got a life (‘it’s based on a true story – and there aren’t many Fringe shows by and about middle-aged people’), the one by two Cornish rappers and a Casiotone (‘er, are you busy? I suppose we should be telling you about our show as you’ve got a reviewer’s badge on. We’re from Cornwall…’), and the one with a gun wearing a condom on the flyer (‘some people find the image disturbing, but don’t mind that, read the back!”) which is the proud winner of the Sir Michael Caine award for new writing. Luckily, I’m rescued by Steve Forster (Escalator’s ever-cheerful press officer), who tells me about something I genuinely do want to see – Thread, the new show by Nutshell, creator of last year’s site-specific success Allotment, which is also back for a one-week run. He also reminds me to come along to the Hunt & Darton Café, which is, yes, a café – but a café as ongoing art project. Kind of like the late-lamented Forest Café but will less lentils, perhaps?

18.00 Somehow – and Lord knows how this happened – I have found myself agreeing to join a makeshift ‘community choir’ being put together for h2dance’s interactive/immersive dance-theatre show Say Something at Summerhall. I tried grumbling that it was all a bit of a busman’s holiday, given that I’ve opted out of paid work with my company Ragroof Theatre in order to dedicate August to my Total Theatre duties at the Fringe, but nevertheless, here I am crawling on the floor and singing ‘la la la la nananana-nanu’ as if my life depended on it. ‘So, see you at tomorrow’s rehearsal’ says h2dance’s Heidi Rustgaard at the end of the evening, and ‘yes’ I say. So that it that….

23.00 Home – or at least home to the place that will be my home for the coming month. Gosh, it hasn’t even started yet and I feel like I’ve been here forever. Has it really been just one day?

www.edfringe.com 

Rob Drummond: Bullet Catch

Rob Drummond: Bullet Catch

Rob Drummond: Bullet Catch

Do you believe in free will? Yes, you answer. Well, did you choose to be born? No, you answer. So, given that this first moment of your life was determined by someone or something other than you, something other than your ‘free will’, and given that every moment from then until now has been a continuous chain of events, each choice the result of an accumulation of circumstances that have gone before, ergo you do not have free will. That, anyway, is the scientific conclusion.

In Bullet Catch writer/performer Rob Drummond, in his alter-ego William Wonder, uses illusion and psychological magic – along with a whole box of clever theatrical tricks that include storytelling and audience interaction – to investigate the big life-and-death questions at the heart of human existence: the free will conundrum; existential angst and the appeal of suicide; the meaning of happiness and how to achieve it. And this all before breakfast! (This was a 10.30am show.)

Key to the tremendous success of Bullet Catch is the clever exploration of the relationship between truth and fiction; between fantasy and reality; between choice and persuasion. Magic turns out to be both metaphor and means for this exploration. Within and around the stage action, the questions are weaved, directly or indirectly. Can we distinguish between real historical reference and a fictional theatrical story? Between scientific fact and religious belief? Who is telling the truth and who is lying? Are we choosing this or is someone choosing for us? Do we want to know how the trick is done – or do we want to hold onto the fantasy and not spoil the magic? If so, close your eyes now – and you might want to put your fingers in your ears too. There’s a big bang coming…

It all circles around an exploration of the (allegedly) true life story of magician William Henderson, who, it is said, ignored his friend Houdini’s advice – which boiled down to ‘don’t do it’ – and was subsequently shot dead on stage whilst attempting the infamous ‘bullet catch’ trick. And yes, you’ve guessed it, the climax of the show is a demonstration of this very trick. Drummond cleverly pairs a reading of Houdini’s letter with a letter allegedly from the Traverse’s health-and-safety office – whose advice is similarly ‘don’t do it’. He beguiles us with his cleverness, and seduces us into accepting that it is fine for us to watch someone shoot at him with a loaded gun.

The twist in the tale comes with the idea that Henderson’s death was not so much a failed trick as the ultimate trick of them all – a clever suicide engineered by the magician, using an innocent audience member as his stooge. Yet why would someone happy and healthy with everything to live for want to kill himself? Enter stage left the sinister spectre of existential nihilism. If free will is the ultimate illusion, then what is there left to live for? Drummond reflects on the appeal of such a suicide tactic – yet still we let him load the gun.

Do we think the gun is loaded with blanks? Or that the ever-willing audience member who has shared the stage with him for practically the whole show as a kind of magician’s assistant cum confidant cum second-actor is a plant? Or do we just trust that whatever is happening on a stage is OK because it is theatre not real life? After all, there are the theatrical trappings – the hand-painted signs and the sepia portraits; the wooden tables, big old trunk, and Crombie overcoat. This is a story, about something that maybe happened in the long-distant past, nothing to do with the here-and-now… isn’t that so?

Ultimately we realise that we never have any way of knowing what is real and what is illusion: the play becomes a metaphor for the great big conjuring trick that is our lives.

With writing as precise and penetrating as a speeding bullet, a very clever use of audience participation that both honours and usurps the traditions of theatre magic shows, and the whole seductive lure of the most infamous trick of them all, Rob Drummond’s mild-mannered William Wonder proves the age-old maxim – that it’s the quiet ones that you have to watch.

Res de Res: (remor) ¦ Photo © Massay

Res de Res: (remor)

Res de Res: (remor) ¦ Photo © Massay

We climb a forbidding flight of stone stairs and reach a high-ceilinged panelled room (this in the C Nova venue, the latest pop-up theatre space in the C Venues empire, housed in a government building). Almost the whole room is taken up by a large rusty-looking box, a kind of shipping container with peepholes. Peering in, we see what looks to be an austere prison cell – distressed white walls, a bare wooden table and chair, a sink with a dripping tap, and an unwelcoming metal bunk bed with no bedding.

An usher opens a door in the container and invites us to enter, and we see two figures lying with their backs to us, bodies squashed against the wall – a woman on the top bunk and a man on the bottom. Over the next eleven minutes, a poignant choreography of angst, loneliness, frustration, and comfort-seeking is played out. An envelope on the table is opened slowly to reveal a letter and a grainy photograph, which is then stuck on the wall. A grille above the bunk bed becomes the scene of a dance of shadowy hands seeking escape. The bars of the metal bed are used to twist and weave through and over as our couple move with and against each other. Relationship to audience in the piece is interesting: the performers don’t acknowledge our presence, but we sit on stools holding torches that we may use in any way we wish – thus cast in the role of prison guards. Our torch beams create a dance of light and shadow around and upon the moving bodies.

There is no clear, determined narrative – instead, we construct narrative. In my head, the Hispanic appearance of the performers and the use of the black-and-white newspaper photographs conjures up memories of the terrible oppressions that took place in South America in the 1970s when so many people were captured and then ‘disappeared’. Other audience members will no doubt have their own thoughts and responses. There is also the possibility that this cell containing one man and one woman is a metaphor for the lifelong struggle of personal relationships.

This is not by any stretch of the imagination a circus show – but the circus skills of the two creator-performers (Marta Barceló and Joan Miquel Artigues) from this renowned Spanish company are evident, and the movement work is breathtakingly precise and gutsy. They are also masters of restrained physical acting – faces portray people who have trained themselves not to give themselves away to onlookers, with eyes that stare forward in blank pain, and small gestures of hopelessness are played with an admirable control and restraint.

Every element of the piece – design, lighting, sound, performance – is thought through carefully, each aspect contributing beautifully to the dramaturgy of the piece.

A visceral and thought-provoking physical theatre piece creating intense visual images that stay burnt in the mind long after we’ve left – some companies manage to say more in eleven minutes than others do in two hours!